1. I’m pretty sure these are chicks who identify as dudes who are wearing dresses to prove a point about how clothing isn’t gender based even though they’re actually dyke tomboys in dresses something something complete and total faggotry.


    1. Ugly – I think that’s at the heart of the problem. In the past, homelier people acknowledged their genetic hand but still did what they could to make themselves as presentable as possible. But now we elevate ugliness, degeneracy, depravity, etc. over the beautiful, the virtuous, the noble and the good. Just compare a modern “sculpture” to the Pietà to see how low we’ve sunk.


  1. BRIGHT SIDE: They will never get to reproduce.. and if, somehow, there is some method of fertilization that is successful, their kids will probably wake up in the middle of the night and kill them in their sleep!


  2. Is the one on the left a Little Person? The proportions seem off*. The one on the right has a terrible chin and a sloping away forehead. Poor thing should have chosen better genetic donors.

    Hate ratio at 79.9%, so there’s some hope.

    *I refuse to even look for the video to find out more.


      1. 1. I prefer Little People. It’s funnier, as if they’re real-life Keeblers.

        2. Your reply is an excellent example of the fact that it’s not just proglodytes who use point-and-shriek virtue signaling. They think they’re fucking hardcases when they do it, too.


      1. The way you posted it, you’d also need to post your IP address and allow full file sharing priveleges for everyone else to view it.


      2. No, you post photos as ”http://somesite.crap/yadda/yadda/yadda/somepic.jpg”
        It’ll appear automatically:


  3. The bitch he/she thing on the left, named Milo Stewart, has some of the most annoying youtube videos. A liberal SJW and a self proclaimed communist, trans, asexual person. She is the personification of decline of America.


  4. I admit to being completely bewildered by this trans movement. I don’t understand the lexicon and I am horrified by the idea that emotionally/psychologically unstable children are being encouraged by purported healthcare professionals to permanently alter their bodies.

    It’s nothing less than hellish. I wonder what (((group))) is responsible for this latest outrageous subversive malevolence?


    1. Not just healthcare professionals.

      There are entire cadres of social workers, counselors, educators, lifestyle consultants, fashion advisers, merchants, advertisers, newsbots, and much more driving young people in these directions.

      It’s sold as justice and edge and freedom and fashion. Not psychological, social, and physical mutilation.

      On the good side, these girls are so ugly, weak, lost, and degenerate that their focus on this nonsense and self-presentation reminds me of that Gary Larson cartoon captioned “How nature says Do Not Touch.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s